I made a ham for Easter last weekend and the recipe I followed called for a bone-in, whole (not sliced) ham. Standing at the grocery store meat counter I didn't know which would be the better choice for this recipe so I did a quick search and learned that shank hams are leaner and easier to carve due to a simple straight bone, and ideal for soups. Butt hams are meatier, fattier, and more tender, but have a complex, tricky T-shaped bone to navigate. Also, shank is generally more budget-friendly*, while the butt is considered better for presentation.
I went with the shank and it was delicious.
*note my store sold both cuts for the same price.
4.7.18: swedish fish cocktail
4.7.17: DIY phone case
4.7.16: how to repair a wall clock
No comments:
Post a Comment